Individual assessment
The merchant, its markets, customer journey, and proposed payment flow are assessed individually.
ListoPays reviews payment processing applications from online casino operators. Any potential setup for eligible Visa and Mastercard cards issued by European or US banks depends on an individual assessment of the merchant, markets, customer journey, and proposed payment flow, with no guarantee of approval.
Processing depends on the individual project review, the proposed markets, customer journey, and the information supplied by the operator.
The merchant, its markets, customer journey, and proposed payment flow are assessed individually.
Be ready to explain applicable operating obligations, markets, and customer-facing controls.
Visa and Mastercard cards issued by European and US banks may be considered for an approved setup.
Information supplied for assessment does not guarantee processing or settlement.
An online casino operator should present a complete description of its entity, domains, activities, relevant territories, customer journey, and requested card flow. Where local obligations apply, the operator should be ready to explain how it meets them. Supplying this information is a starting point for assessment, not an approval guarantee. Customer markets, business model, and operating controls must be understood before an available configuration can be discussed. The submitted description should also match the live public offer so that the proposed payment flow can be assessed against a real customer journey.
An operator should describe the customer journey, account access, deposit behavior, support process, and any controls it applies under its own obligations. Written policies should match the website and operating process. Material changes to customer territories, domains, control providers, or transaction patterns may require a further assessment before an altered flow can be discussed. These are merchant-preparation considerations, not stated ListoPays policy requirements.
Visa and Mastercard cards issued by European and US banks may be considered for a reviewed merchant configuration. Card brand or issuing geography alone does not guarantee that a specific card, transaction, customer, or casino will be accepted. Availability depends on the complete reviewed profile and the conditions agreed for the account. The operator should explain where customers are located, how card payments enter the account flow, how transaction purposes are displayed, and how exceptions are handled by its support team.
The documentation exposes payment API, refund, customer-charge, and Webhook sections. Documentation does not itself authorize a particular use case, and the available scope depends on the reviewed configuration. Technical teams should agree the approved status handling, keep internal links between customers and transactions, and prevent a browser response alone from updating value or access. Testing should cover the states and exceptions that apply to the approved flow.
Operational records should allow the casino to connect an account, payment attempt, refund, and support case where relevant. Clear ownership is needed for unusual activity and discrepancies. The operator should also keep public rules, customer communications, and account behavior aligned with the reviewed model. These practices support assessment and ongoing operations but do not replace the operator's own responsibilities or guarantee processing. A material mismatch between submitted information and live activity can lead to additional questions or changes in availability.
Settlement is part of the individual decision, not a standard promise for online casinos. The actual method and commercial conditions depend on the reviewed merchant profile and operating conditions. An operator may share its preferred settlement approach and reconciliation needs during assessment, but it should not assume that every option is available. Financial planning should use only the settlement conditions explicitly confirmed for the account. The operator should keep order, payment, and customer-support records clear enough to reconcile the conditions eventually confirmed for its account. Internal teams should know which contact owns each reconciliation exception. The operator should also describe any material change to the submitted operation before introducing it into the live payment flow, rather than assuming that an earlier discussion covers new products, markets, or transaction behavior.
Provide the operating entity, domains, offered markets, customer geographies, and requested card flow.
Explain customer journey, support, restrictions, recordkeeping, and related operating procedures.
Submit requested business, website, transaction, customer-support, refund, and technical information for review.
Implement only the agreed flow and validate status handling, controls, reporting, refunds, and settlement records.
Onboarding depends on the review of the business, jurisdiction, and payment model.
Share your operation, markets, customer flow, and technical information for an individual processing assessment.